18. Substitution of new section for section 35.-For section 35 of the principal Act, the following section shall be substituted, namely:- 

"35. Power to order adulterer or adulteress to pay costs.-(1) Whenever, in any petition presented by a husband or wife, the alleged adulterer or adulteress, as the case may be, has been made a co-respondent, and the adultery has been established, the court may order the co-respondent to pay: 

Provided that the co-respondent shall not be ordered to pay the petitioners cost-

(a) if the respondent was, at the time of adultery, living apart from her husband and leading the life of a prostitute or from his wife and was leading an immoral life, as the case may be; or 

(b) if the respondent had not, at the time of adultery, reason to believe the respondent to be a married woman or married man. 

(2) Whenever any application is made under section17, the court, if it thinks that the applicant had no grounds or no sufficient grounds for intervening, may order him to pay the whole or any part of the costs occasioned by the application.".

19. Amendment of section 36.-In section 36 of the principal Act, in the proviso, the words "or is confirmed,  as the case may be" shall be omitted.

20. Amendment of section 37.-In section 37 of the principal Act, for the portion beginning with the words "The High Court" and ending with the words "the husband shall", the words "Where a decree of dissolution of the marriage or a decree of judicial separation is obtained by the wife, the District Court may order that the husband shall" shall be substituted.

21. Amendment of section 40.-In section 40 of the principal Act, for the portion beginning with the words "The High Court" and ending with the words "may inquire into", the words "The District Court may, before passing a decree for dissolution of the marriage or a decree of nullity of marriage, inquire into" shall be substituted.

22. Amendment of section 43.-In section 43 of the principal Act, for the portion beginning with the words "In any suit for obtaining" and ending with the words "deems proper", the words "In any suit for obtaining a dissolution of marriage or a decree of nullity of marriage instituted in a District Court, the court may before making its decree from time to time make such interim orders as it may deem proper" shall be substituted.

23. Amendment of section 44.-In section 44 of the principal Act, for the portion beginning with the words "The High Court" and ending with the words "may upon application", the words "Where a decree of dissolution or nullity of marriage has been passed, the District Court may, upon application" shall be substituted.

24. Amendment of section 45.-In section 45 of the principal Act, for the words "Code of Civil Procedure", the words and figures "Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908)" shall be substituted.

25. Amendment of section 52.-In section 52 of the principal Act, for the portion beginning with the words "by a wife" and ending with the words "without reasonable excuse", the words "by a husband or a wife, praying that his or her marriage may be dissolved by reason of his wife on her husband, as the case may be, having been guilty of adultery, cruelty or desertion" shall be substituted.                                                                               

26. Amendment of section 55.-In section 55 of the principal Act,-

(a) the first proviso shall be omitted; 

(b) in the second proviso, for the words "Provided also", the words "Provided" shall be substituted.

27. Substitution of new section for section 57.-For section 57 of the principal Act, the following section shall be substituted, namely:- 

"57. Liberty to parties to marry again.-Where a decree for dissolution or nullity of marriage has been passed and either the time for appeal has expired without an appeal having been presented to any court including the Supreme Court or an appeal has been presented but has been dismissed and the decree or dismissal has become final, it shall be lawful for either party to the marriage to marry again.".

28. Amendment of section 62.-In section 62 of the principal Act, for the words "Code of Civil Procedure", the words and figures "Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (5 of 1908)" shall be substituted.

29. Repeal.-The Indian and Colonial Divorce Jurisdiction Act, 1926, the Indian and Colonial Divorce Jurisdiction Act,1940 and the Indian Divorce Act,1945 are hereby repealed. (16 & 17 Geo. 5,c. 40, 3 and 4 Geo IV C.35, 9 Geo VI C.51).

STATEMENT  OF  OBJECTS  AND   REASONS

The Law Commission of India in its 164th Report on "The Indian Divorce Act (IV of 1869)" presented to the Government in November, 1998 has, inter alia, recommended that Parliament may enact a comprehensive law governing marriage and divorce and other allied aspects of the Christians in India. The Commission, relying on the judgments and observations of certain High Courts, has also urged the Central Government to take
immediate measures-

(i) to amend section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 relating to grounds of dissolution of marriages so that the female spouses are not discriminated vis a vis male spouses in obtaining a decree of dissolution of marriage;

(ii) to amend suitably sections 17 and 20 of the Act to do away with the procedural requirement of obtaining confirmation from the High Court in respect of a decree of dissolution of marriage or decree of nullity of marriage as such a procedure is long-drawn and strenuous.

2. With a view to ascertaining the views of the Christian community on proposal for a unified law on marriage and divorce, the Central Government convened a meeting of leaders of prominent Churches in India and the Members of Parliament belonging to the Christian community on the 28th April, 2000 but there was no consensus for bringing in a comprehensive legislation on Christian marriages and matrimonial causes. However, there is no opposition from any one to amend sections 10, 17 and 20 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 suitably to remove the gender inequality as contained in section 10 and to do away with the procedural delays in obtaining divorce due to the provisions contained in sections 17 and 20 of the Act. The Government, therefore, proposes to make suitable changes in the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 for removing hardship to all concerned.

3. The Commission on Review of Administrative Laws which was set up by the Central Government on the 8th May, 1998 has, inter alia,  recommended repeal of various enactments including three British Statutes relating to Christian Personal Law still in force. It is proposed to repeal these enactments also as they have become obsolete.

4. This Bill seeks to achieve the above objects.

ARUN  JAITLEY.

New Delhi;

The  17th November, 2000.