// archives

Archive for July, 2009

Changed allegations are immaterial

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR Date of Decision: 9-5-2007 CRL.M.C.204/07 Smt. Kamna Chauhan….. Petitioner Through: Shri. Rajesh Shukla, Advocate versus THE STATE (Madhya Pradesh) and Ors…..Respondents Shri. M. Bhardwaj, Advocate for State. The instant revision is for impugning the order dated 19th February 2007 passed by the Sessions judge, Gwalior in [...]

FIR no Pre-requisite for AB

GURBAKSH SINGH SIBBIA V. STATE OF PUNJAB [1980] INSC 70 (9 April 1980) CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. ((CJ) CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. ((CJ) BHAGWATI, P.N. UNTWALIA, N.L.PATHAK, R.S.REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J) CITATION: 1980 AIR 1632 1980 SCR (3) 383 1980 SCC (2) 565 CITATOR INFO :R 1982 SC 149 (259) E&R 1985 SC 969 (6,8,12) ACT:Bail-Anticipatory Bail-Section 438 of [...]

SAVITRI AGARWAL Vs. State of Maharashtra – Bail

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1178-1179 OF 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) Nos. 5563-5564 of 2008) SAVITRI AGARWAL & ORS. — APPELLANT (S) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. — RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT: D.K. JAIN, J. Leave granted. 2. Challenge in these two appeals is to the [...]

Landmark SC Judgment on S. 125 CrPC

Supreme Court Cases 316-2008 Chaturbhuj Vs. Sitabai, Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. The object of the maintenance proceedings is not to punish a person for his past neglect, but to prevent vagrancy by compelling those who can provide support to those who are unable to support themselves and who have a moral claim [...]

No 2 simultaneous proceedings in two different Courts

Ravindra Haribhau Karmarkar vs Mrs. Shaila Ravindra Karmarkar And Another on 17/7/1991 JUDGMENT 1. In the instant application, the substantial question of law, in the public interest, has been raised and requires decision from this Court. The substantial question of law raised is as under : “Whether a Judicial Magistrate First Class trying an application [...]

498a Jurisdiction

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: INDIAN PENAL CODE WP(Crl.)No. 415/04 Reserved on: 22.10.2007 Date of Decision: 04.01.2008 Niraj Trivedi ……. Petitioner Through : Mr.Sushil Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Shekhar and Ms.Anita, Advocates. versus State of Bihar and Ors. … Respondents Through : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate WP(Crl.)No. 235/04 [...]

Dowry given but Man charged with Alimony

As Per IPC 498a Giving dowry is crime, but Judiciary will not Punish IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Hindu Marriage Act CM(M) No.1440/2007 DATE OF DECISION: 14.1.2008 Rishi Kumar …….. Petitioner through: Mr.Dhananjay Pandey, Adv. and Mr.A.K.Pandey, Adv. VERSUS Suman …….. Respondent through: Mrs.Geeta A. Kumar, Adv. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, [...]

How Visitation should be determined

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT:CRP No.276/2003 Date of Hearing : March 15, 2004. Date of Decision: April 12, 2004. Hindu Marriage Act 1955 -Custody of the Minor Child Paramjit Singh Lamba …Petitioner through Mr. J.P. Singh, Advocate Versus Smt. Prabjot Kaur …Respondent through Mr. K. Sultan Singh with Mr. Manish [...]

Contract/Consent form to be used when having consensual sex

Download fron here >> form before consensual sex and get it signed before you BED

498A Dismissed and Judicial Separation.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Ganga vs Satish Sitole on 11/11/2003 JUDGMENT : A.K. Awasthy, J. 1. Appellant/defendant has filed this appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the judgment and decree dated 23.10.2001, passed by IXth Additional District Judge, Indore in Hindu Marriage Case No. 383/98, whereby the decree of judicial separation [...]

Categories

  • No categories

New Posts Notification

Email:

eXTReMe Tracker