Delhi High Court Mrs. Anoop Beniwal vs Dr. Jagbir Singh Beniwal on 25 October, 1989 Equivalent citations: AIR 1990 Delhi 305, I (1990) DMC 239, 1989 RLR 554 Bench: M Narain ORDER 1. The plaintiff, Mrs. Anoop Beniwal, has filed this suit for declaration. By…
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.11.2016 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM CMA(MD)No.1149 of 2016 M.Panchavarnam … Appellant vs. Arthi … Respondent Appeal filed under Section 47 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890,against the fair and executable order dated 22.08.2016 passed…
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-1423-2019 Date of decision: 03.11.2020 Mandeep Kaur …..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI Argued by : Mr. Divjyot S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan…
Supreme Court of India Sarita Sharma vs Sushil Sharma on 16 February, 2000 Equivalent citations: 2000 (2) ALD Cri 110, 2000 CriLJ 1459, 2000 1 SCR 915, 2000 (1) UJ 623 SC Bench: G Nanavati, S Phukan JUDGMENT G.T. Nanavati, J. 1. This appeal is…
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2003 Sanjeev Vyankatesh Ranade, Age 41 years, Occ:-Business, Residing at 17/A/6, Vijay Bunglow, Near Ashwamedh Hall, Erandwana,Karve Road, Pune- 411 004. …Appellant Versus Meghna Sanjeev Ranade, Age 39…
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 7232-7233 of 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) 35468-69 of 2009) Gaytri Bajaj … Appellant Versus Jiten Bhalla … Respondent J U D G M E N T RANJAN GOGOI, J. Leave granted….
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Anil Khatwani vs. Nistha Khatwani S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 1250/2008 DATE OF JUDGMENT : 10th May, 2012. PRESENT HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr.Sachin Acharya, for the appellant – husband. Mr. T.R.Singh Sodha, for the…
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH A.F.R. RESERVED Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. – 72 of 2004 Appellant :- Smt. Archana Sharma Respondent :- Mukesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Appellant :- S.C. Srivastava,Manoj K Jaiswal,Satish Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- S.C. Shukla,Indrajeet…
PLEASE REGISTER TO DOWNLOAD JUDGMENTS
We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do
Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE
We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…
Recent Comments