indian penal code 304 – MyNation KnowledgeBase

Mere direct of dowry, No determined direct of dowry clear in 498A and 304B

Posted on 12/10/2018 by MyNation 1 Comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1097/2012 JAGDISH & ORS…Appellants Versus STATE OF UTTARANCHAL ..Respondent J U D G M E N T R. BANUMATHI, J. JUDGEMENT This interest arises out of visualisation antiquated 29.12.2011 upheld by High Court…

Prosecution unsuccessful to entirely prove mandate of both Section 113B of Evidence Act and Section 304B, IPC

Posted on 12/10/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1081 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5450 of 2009) Durga Prasad & Anr. … Appellants Vs. The State of M.P. … Respondent J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR,…

One Month Civil Imprisonment for Default of Maintenance

Posted on 19/05/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 677 of 2018 13.03.2018 Gobbatina Venkateswara Rao.. Petitioner/petitioner Vs. State of A.P. represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and one another ……

304-B, General, Vague and Inconsistent statements, Section 498-A set aside

Posted on 09/01/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1029 of 2001 PETITIONER:SUNIL BAJAJ… APPELLANT Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF M.P…. RESPONDENT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/10/2001 BENCH:U.C. Banerjee ,Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT: SHIVARAJ V. PATIL J. Leave granted. The appellant has filed this appeal, aggrieved by the order dated…

Conflicting statements of Dowry in 304-b, charge removed

Posted on 09/01/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

Rajasthan High Court Vishwa Kumar Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 1 February, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2006 CriLJ 2096, I (2006) DMC 574, RLW 2006 (2) Raj 1123, 2006 (2) WLC 268 Bench: R Chauhan JUDGMENT R.S. Chauhan, J. 1. Within two days…

Improved allegations, Sections 498A and 304-B, IPC. set aside

Posted on 16/11/201721/09/2021 by MyNation Leave a comment

Andhra High Court Paidimarri Shanker And Ors. vs State Of A.P. on 5 September, 2003 Equivalent citations: 2003 (2) ALD Cri 538, I (2004) DMC 546 JUDGMENT K.C. Bhanu, J. JUDGMENT K.C. Bhanu, J. 1. This statutory appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,…

Enter your email Address

MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: indian penal code 304

Mere direct of dowry, No determined direct of dowry clear in 498A and 304B

Prosecution unsuccessful to entirely prove mandate of both Section 113B of Evidence Act and Section 304B, IPC

One Month Civil Imprisonment for Default of Maintenance

304-B, General, Vague and Inconsistent statements, Section 498-A set aside

Conflicting statements of Dowry in 304-b, charge removed

Improved allegations, Sections 498A and 304-B, IPC. set aside

STUDY REPORTS

Recent Comments

SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

498A victim Autobiography

MyNation Blog

News

Home Remedies N tips

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away