MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Supreme Court: Guidelines for exercise of power U/S 319 of CRPC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 885 of 2019, Decided On: 05.12.2022 Sukhpal Singh Khaira Vs. The State of Punjab Hon’ble Judges/Coram: S. Abdul Nazeer, B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. Author:A.S. Bopanna, J. Citation: MANU/SC/1577/2022 1. In the…

Whether accused can claim that they were discharged from offence if they were discharged from custody on application of investigating officer?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 813 of 2019 Decided On: 01.05.2019 Rajesh and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana Hon’ble Judges/Coram: L. Nageswara Rao and M.R. Shah, JJ. Citation: MANU/SC/0649/2019 1. Leave granted. 2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment…

Accused has a right to cross-examine the witnesses

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sunil Mehta & ANR. Vs. State of Gujarat & ANR. [Criminal Appeal No. 327 of 2013 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.374 of 2012] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The short question that falls for our determination in this…

Whether Section 319 Cr.P.C. extendable to summon a person not named in the FIR

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1750 OF 2008 Hardeep Singh…Appellant Versus State of Punjab & Ors.…Respondents With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1751 of 2008 Manjit Pal Singh…Appellant Versus State of Punjab & Anr.…Respondents With SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO….

Strong Evidence needed to add Additional Accused u/s.319 CrPC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 763 OF 2017 BRIJENDRA SINGH & ORS. …..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN …..RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T A.K. SIKRI, J. The appellants herein, three in number, have been summoned…

SC explain how to issue Warrants

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1190 OF 2013 ( Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 6081 of 2013) Vikas .. Appellant(s) Versus State of Rajasthan .. Respondent(s) O R D E R 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal…

Sections 406, 498-A IPC found to be false, Section 328 IPC was deleted

IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.2665 of 2013(O&M) Date of decision : 26.08.2013 Mukesh Rani… Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others… Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL Present: Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. REKHA MITTAL, J.(ORAL) The present…

Powers under Sections 173(8) for Reinvestigation

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 1283 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2703 of 2008) Decided On: 21.07.2009 Appellants: Kishan Lal Vs. Respondent: Dharmendra Bafna and Anr. Hon’ble Judges: S.B. Sinha and Deepak Verma, JJ. Counsels: For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: K.T.S….

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation