MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Whether the court should set aside conviction if there is a compromise between convict and victim after conviction in a non-compoundable offence?

Bombay High Court Kiran Tulshiram Ingale vs Anupama P. Gaikwad And Ors. on 25 July, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2006 CriLJ 4591 Bench: D Deshpande, S Bobde JUDGMENT D.G. Deshpande, J. 1. Heard advocates for the petitioner and Respondent No. 1. Petitioner is the husband and…

Whether Kitchen Knife & Sil Batta are Dangerous Weapons?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 714 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) NO.431 OF 2015) NANDA GOPALAN …APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF KERALA …RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave…

Criminal case compounded as the offence alleged was not ‘stricto sensu’ against the State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA   Cr. Revision No. 173 of 2009. Date of decision: 15th May, 2018. Sunit Singh & anr. …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. ……Respondent Coram :The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. For the Petitioners : Mr….

Sections 324/34 IPC quash with Section 482 Cr.P.C

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5154/2015 & Crl.M.A. No. 18560/2015 Date of Decision : April 1st , 2016 SANJAY BHARDWAJ … Petitioner Through: Mr.Arjun Singh Bhati, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. … Respondent Through: Mr.Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP. Mr.Vishal Sharma,…

S.482-Apex Court can quash non-compoundable offences

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4159/2015 & Crl.M.A. 14917/2015 Date of Decision : January 22nd, 2016 SMT POOJA SAXENA ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajan Chaudhary, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ….. Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Kumar…

Sec.320 will not limit the powers of the HC to quash case under Sec.482.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 447 OF 2013 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 6462 of 2012) Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. …. Appellant(s) Versus Babita Raghuvanshi & Anr. …. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T…

498A quash – It should not be used to achieve oblique motives

Refer : >> http://mynation.net/docs/1716-2007/     Check All Judgements List here >> http://mynation.net/docs/sitemap/

498A Convicted case compounded

Mumbai High Court Abasaheb Yadav Honmane And Ashwini Abasaheb Honmane vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12/3/2008 JUDGMENT Swatanter Kumar, C.J. 1. Introduction and Legislative History 1.1 Legislative amendments and judicial pronouncements over a period of time have effectively expanded the scope of the canons…

Sanapareddy Maheedhar and Another vs State of Andhra Pradesh

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 13 Dec 2007 CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1708 of 2007 PETITIONER:Sanapareddy Maheedhar and Another RESPONDENT:State of Andhra Pradesh and Another DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/12/2007 BENCH:S.B. Sinha & G.S. Singhvi JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T(arising out of Special Leave Petition…

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation