MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Procedure which police should follow while filing chargesheet U/S 299 of CrPC against absconded accused

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1524 OF 2021 MANDA SUNIL PAWAR AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. PRONOUNCED ON : 08th APRIL, 2022 1 The applicants are…

HC held Complainant Proclaimed Offender

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM M-359 of 2012 Date of Decision: October 16, 2012 Smt. Deeksha Puri …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed…

HC Dismiss the petition to quash the order where Complainant declared PO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1222-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 10, 2013 Puneet Sharma…Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another…Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. To be referred…

Bombay HC: 498A FIR/chargesheet Quash against Married Sister-in-Law

Bombay High Court Asalam Khan Rahemtulla Khan And … vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 2 February, 2017 Bench: S.S. Shinde 1 Cri.A-4928-16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4928 OF 2016 1. Asalam Khan…

Bombay HC: LOC & PO Quashed of MRA Veteran – Landmark Judgement

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3209 OF 2014 Mr Sandip Shankarlal Kedia ….                Petitioner. V/s  The State of Maharashtra and Another ……     Respondents.   Mr. Niranjan…

Without s.4 of S.82 CrPc Accused cannt be declared proclaimed offender

CWP No.13842 of 2010 Satinder Singh Vs. The State of U.T., Chandigarh and another Present: Mr.Vivek Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms.Smriti Dhir, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh. Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Petitioner is an accused in FIR No.177, dated…

Accused presence is not compulsory Always

Bombay High Court Bhaskar Sen vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 1 September, 2004 Bench: D Bhosale JUDGMENT D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. This group of five petitions involves a common question of law and, therefore, were heard together and are being disposed of by…

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation