Atanu Ghosh & Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 17 May, 2017

1

17/05/2017

ARDR
CRR 3757 of 2014

Atanu Ghosh ors.

Vs.

State of West Bengal anr.

Mr. U. S. Chattopadhyay,
Ms. Snigdha Saha,
…for the petitioners.

Mr. Imran Ali,
…for the State.

Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners,

who has contended that the FIR itself does not disclose any overt act

alleged to have been committed by the present petitioners. The present

petitioners are the maternal uncle-in-law and aunt. Admittedly, they are

residing at Dum Dum within the North 24 Parganas district, whereas the

alleged incident took place within the jurisdiction of Uttarpara P.S. It is

not disputed that the present accused persons are residing in separate

mess and in separate houses and that place is far away from the de-facto

complainant’s house. From the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.

P.C., it does not transpire regarding any ingredient of offence either under

Section 498A or 406 I.P.C. Only statement that has appeared against

them from the prosecution witnesses that all these all these accused

persons induced the mother-in-law to commit the offence. They have not

stated specifically what type of inducement that has been done.

So, in my view, no offence has been made out against the present

petitioners. It has been noticed, more often than not, that there is a
2

tendency to entangle all the relations in any kind of matrimonial dispute.

This practice has been deprecated by the Hon’ble Apex Court also in

many occasions. Therefore, it would be sheer abuse of process to

continue with this case in respect of these accused persons only.

READ  Krishnan & Anr vs Krishnaveni & Anr on 24 January, 1997

Accordingly, the CRR stands allowed.

The proceeding bearing G.R. case no. 573 of 2013 arising out of

Uttarpara P.S. case no. 165 of 2013 be quashed in respect of the present

petitioners, namely, Atanu Ghosh, Biswnath Ghosh, Tarun Kanti Ghosh

and Smt. Chhabi Ghosh.

However, I make it clear that the proceeding in respect of other

accused persons shall go on.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given

to the parties.

(Siddhartha Chattopadhyay, J. )

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *