Sukha Ram & Ors vs State & Anr on 25 May, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 710 / 2017

1. Sukha Ram S/o Sh. Gokul Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 65 Years,
R/o Rohishi, Thanwala, Riya Badi, District Nagaur (Raj.)

2. Dev Raj S/o Sh. Gokul Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 62 Years, R/o
Rohishi, Thanwala, Riya Badi, District Nagaur (Raj.)

3. Shivji Ram S/o Sh. Roopa Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 55 Years,
R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

4. Santosh Devi W/o Sh. Shivji Ram B/c Jat,, Aged About 51
Years, R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

5. Ramkishore S/o Sh. Shivji Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 22 Years,
R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

6. Narsi Ram S/o Sh. Shivji Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 27 Years,
R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

7. Radha Devi W/o Sh. Narsi Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

8. Ram Kumar S/o Sh. Shivaji Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

9. Kailash S/o Sh. Roopa Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 37 Years, R/o
Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

10. Sanju Devi W/o Sh. Kailash, B/c Jat,, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

11. Presta W/o Sh. Ram Kishore, B/c Jat,, Aged About 21 Years,
R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

12. Ghasi Ram S/o Sh. Ugra Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Kudki, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.)

13. Ramniwas S/o Sh. Teja Ram, B/c Jat,, Aged About 56 Years,
R/o Keriya Makda, District Nagour (Raj.)

READ  State Of W.B vs Orilal Jaiswal on 23 September, 1993

—-Petitioners
Versus

1. State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

2. Smt. Sushila W/o Ram Kunwar (D/o Deva Ram) B/c Jat,, Aged
About 25 Years, R/o Bijathal, Tehsil – Riya Badi, District- Nagour.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. DK Godara for Mr. OP Sangwa
For Respondent(s) :Mr. MS Panwar, PP
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-710/2017]

For Complainant(s):Mr. Pawan Singh for Mr. Ravindra Singh
Rathore
__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
25/05/2017

1. Petitioners have preferred this misc. petition under

Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR No.34/2017

registered at Police Station Thnwala, and all further proceeding

initiated in pursuant thereof, for the offence falling under sections

498A, 406 323 of IPC.

2. The array of 13 petitioners show that the complete

family was arrayed as accused persons by the complainant. The

concern of this Court has been met with from the investigation

report which has concluded that the offence has been found to be

prima facie made out only against Ramkunwar, Shivji Ram

Santoshi Devi. Since the prima faice offence has not been made

out against rest of the petitioners and the investigation is

complete, therefore, in the opinion of this Court no further

adjudication is required under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

3. However, both the parties shall be free to make

representations before the investigating authority regarding their

remaining issues and the investigating authority shall consider the

issue raised by the parties for completion of the investigation.

4. Consequently, this misc. petition is disposed of.

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

READ  Gowar Chand-vs-The Superintendent Of Police, on 30 July, 1987

sudheer

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *