IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2017/6TH CHAITHRA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 2102 of 2017 ()
—————————
CC 349/2017 of J.M.F.C.,KATTAKADA
CRIME NO. 1047/2016 OF KATTAKADA POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANDAPURAM
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3:
—————————————————————-
ROYDAS,
AGED 33, S/O.CHRISTUDAS, RESIDING AT CHRIST VILLA,
KATTAKODE POST, KULATHUMMAL VILLAGE, KATTAKADA TALUK,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695572
BY ADVS.SRI.RAM MOHAN.G.
SRI.G.P.SHINOD
SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN
SRI.AJIT G.ANJARLEKAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:
———————————————————————————
1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
2. SAJEELA,
D/O.LATHIKA, AGED 29 YEARS, L S VILASAM, KANTHALA,
KATTAKODE POST, KULATHUMMAL VILLAGE, KATTAKADA TALUK,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695572
R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH
R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SMT. M K PUSHPALATHA
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-03-
2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 2102 of 2017 ()
—————————
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
——————————
ANNEXURE A : A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1047/2016 OF
KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION
ANNEXURE B : A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME
NO.1047/2016 OF KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION
ANNEXURE C : THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 12.3.2017 SWORN TO BY THE SECOND
RESPONDENT
RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS : NIL
———————–
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – — – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – –
Crl.M.C. No.2102 of 2017
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 27th day of March 2017
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.349 of 2017
on the files of the court below. The offences alleged as per
Annexure-B are the offences under Sections 498A and 324
read with Section 34 I.P.C.
2. The 2nd respondent is the de-facto complainant in
this case.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the
learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and the learned
Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned advocates on both sides and the
Crl.M.C.2102/2017
-: 2 :-
learned Public Prosecutor have submitted that the matter
has been settled between the parties. The 2nd respondent
filed affidavit stating that the matter has been settled
between the parties and hence, the second respondent has
no further grievance against the petitioner. The above
dispute arose out of family relationship. Therefore, since
the matter has been settled by the parties, I am of the view
that it is only just and proper to quash Annexure-B final
report and further proceedings against the petitioner in
C.C. No.349 of 2017 on the files of the court below, in
exercise of the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,
to meet the ends of justice and accordingly, I order so.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed.
Sd/-
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,
JUDGE
dl/27..3..2017
