Cc 349/2017 Of J.M.F.C. vs By Advs.Sri.Ram Mohan.G on 12 March, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2017/6TH CHAITHRA, 1939

Crl.MC.No. 2102 of 2017 ()
—————————
CC 349/2017 of J.M.F.C.,KATTAKADA
CRIME NO. 1047/2016 OF KATTAKADA POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANDAPURAM

PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3:
—————————————————————-

ROYDAS,
AGED 33, S/O.CHRISTUDAS, RESIDING AT CHRIST VILLA,
KATTAKODE POST, KULATHUMMAL VILLAGE, KATTAKADA TALUK,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695572

BY ADVS.SRI.RAM MOHAN.G.
SRI.G.P.SHINOD
SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN
SRI.AJIT G.ANJARLEKAR

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:
———————————————————————————

1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM

2. SAJEELA,
D/O.LATHIKA, AGED 29 YEARS, L S VILASAM, KANTHALA,
KATTAKODE POST, KULATHUMMAL VILLAGE, KATTAKADA TALUK,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695572

R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH
R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SMT. M K PUSHPALATHA

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-03-
2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 2102 of 2017 ()
—————————

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
——————————

ANNEXURE A : A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1047/2016 OF
KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION

ANNEXURE B : A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME
NO.1047/2016 OF KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION

ANNEXURE C : THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 12.3.2017 SWORN TO BY THE SECOND
RESPONDENT

RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS : NIL
———————–

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – — – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – –
Crl.M.C. No.2102 of 2017
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 27th day of March 2017

READ  Shekhar Amonkar-vs-State on 1 January, 1994

O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.349 of 2017

on the files of the court below. The offences alleged as per

Annexure-B are the offences under Sections 498A and 324

read with Section 34 I.P.C.

2. The 2nd respondent is the de-facto complainant in

this case.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the

learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and the learned

Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned advocates on both sides and the

Crl.M.C.2102/2017
-: 2 :-

learned Public Prosecutor have submitted that the matter

has been settled between the parties. The 2nd respondent

filed affidavit stating that the matter has been settled

between the parties and hence, the second respondent has

no further grievance against the petitioner. The above

dispute arose out of family relationship. Therefore, since

the matter has been settled by the parties, I am of the view

that it is only just and proper to quash Annexure-B final

report and further proceedings against the petitioner in

C.C. No.349 of 2017 on the files of the court below, in

exercise of the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,

to meet the ends of justice and accordingly, I order so.

In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed.

Sd/-

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,
JUDGE
dl/27..3..2017

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *