CRM No.M-14950 of 2017 [1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT
CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M- 14950 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: May 1 , 2017.
Manoj …… PETITIONER (s)
Versus
State of Haryana …… RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
*****
LISA GILL, J.
Petitioner seeks the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No.502
dated 23.12.2016 under Sections 498A/323/307/120B IPC registered at Police
Station Sadar, Sonipat.
It is submitted that the petitioner’s mother was granted the
concession of anticipatory bail and the petitioner’s father was afforded the
benefit of regular bail. It is contended that there are no allegations attracting
the rigors of Section 307 IPC therefore, this petition be allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone
through the file.
Specific allegations of demand of dowry, harassment and physical
abuse have been raised against the petitioner in the FIR. The petitioner is
alleged to have surreptitiously taken the complainant to a secluded place on
1 of 2
06-05-2017 17:44:03 :::
CRM No.M-14950 of 2017 [2]
22.12.2016. He tried to strangulate her in order to kill her. The complainant fell
unconscious. When she regained consciousness, some passersby helped her.
The complainant called her home. Her younger brother and paternal uncle
came to the spot. The complainant was admitted in the Government Hospital,
Sonipat and thereafter to Cygnus Hospital, Factory Area, Sonipat for treatment.
There is a mention of four injuries on the person of the complainant including
injury on the neck.
Keeping in view the specific allegations against the petitioner, I do
not find any ground to afford the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
( LISA GILL )
May 1 , 2017. JUDGE
‘om’
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
2 of 2
06-05-2017 17:44:05 :::