Jignasha vs Mahesh Natvarlal Chauhan on 12 June, 2017

C/FA/1682/2017 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1682 of 2017

JIGNASHA W/O MAHESHBHAI CHAUHAN AND D/O
KAMLESHBHAI NARSINH CHAVDA….Appellant(s)
Versus
MAHESH NATVARLAL CHAUHAN….Defendant(s)

Appearance:
MR NV GANDHI, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
HCLS COMMITTEE, ADVOCATE for the Defendant(s) No. 1
MR. BHAVIK P SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Defendant(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 12/06/2017

ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT)

Shri N.V. Gandhi, learned counsel for the appellant has
submitted that the learned Family Judge has not considered
the factum of the appellant filing a case against the husband
and husband being proceeded against for the offence
punishable under sections 498A and 506 of the Indian Penal
Code, we are of the view that let there be notice for final
disposal returnable on 10th July 2017.

In the meanwhile, the respondent shall not insist for
enforcement of the impugned judgment and order passed by
the learned Judge of the Family Court.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.)

(A.G.URAIZEE, J.)
mohd

Page 1 of 1

HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Mon Jun 12 23:52:03 IST 2017

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *