202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Criminal Misc. M- No. 26736 of 2016 (OM)
Date of decision : May 23, 2017
Sukhdeep Singh …..Petitioner
Sukhwinder Kaur ….Respondent
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr.Iqbal Singh Mann, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Nikhil Bhatia, Advocate
for the respondent.
LISA GILL, J.
The petitioner seeks concession of anticipatory bail in
complaint case No. Compl./39/2014 dated 05.03.2014 registered under
It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in
this case. Marriage of the petitioner was solemnised with the complainant
on 21.02.2010, however, no complaint whatsoever was ever made nor any
protest raised by his wife, till the filing of the complaint on 05.03.2014.
Furthermore, the petitioner it is submitted has appeared before the learned
trial Court pursuant to interim order dated 05.08.2016 passed by this Court.
The petitioner undertakes to appear on each and every date fixed before the
learned trial Court and face trial. He is a permanent resident of Bathinda and
there is no possibility of his absconding. Therefore, this petition be
1 of 2
07-06-2017 15:43:14 :::
Criminal Misc. M- No. 26736 of 2016 (OM) -2-
Learned counsel for the respondent while opposing this
petition submits that there are serious allegations against the petitioner.
While admitting that no formal complaint or FIR was lodged against the
petitioner since the marriage on 21.02.2010, till the filing of the complaint,
it is submitted that efforts were made to solve the issue by convening
panchayat. It is, however, not denied that the petitioner has appeared before
the learned trial Court and is facing trial.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but
without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just
and expedient to allow this petition. Interim bail granted to the petitioner by
the learned trial Court, pursuant to order dated 05.08.2016 be made absolute
subject to the petitioner furnishing fresh bail bonds and surety to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Court. It is made clear that there is no stay of
the proceedings before the learned trial Court.
May 23, 2017 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
07-06-2017 15:43:15 :::