Surendrasinh Daulatsinh Butola … vs State Of Gujarat on 28 June, 2017

R/CR.MA/14641/2017 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 14641 of 2017

SURENDRASINH DAULATSINH BUTOLA (RAJPUT)….Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT….Respondent(s)

Appearance:
MR K J PANCHAL, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KL PANDYA APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.H.VORA
Date : 28/06/2017
ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned
A.P.P. for the respondent – State.

2. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with F.I.R.
being C.R.No.I-19 of 2017 registered with Amraiwadi police
station for the offences punishable under
Sections 498A, 306
and
114 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 of the
Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Considering the chargesheet papers supplied by the
learned A.P.P. during the course of hearing, it appears that the
applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased, who is aged 60
years. The offence alleged against the applicant does not
provide punishment either for life imprisonment or capital
punishment. Therefore, there is no likelihood of fleeing from
justice or escaping from the trial. Looking to the applicant’s
deep roots in the society, present application deserves
consideration.

Page 1 of 3

HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Thu Jun 29 02:18:04 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/14641/2017 ORDER

4. Hence, the application is allowed and the applicant is
ordered to be released on bail in connection with C.R.No.I-19 of
2017 registered with Amraiwadi police station on executing a
bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one
surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court
and subject to the conditions that the applicant shall;

READ  Smt. Debalina Das (Saha) vs Dr. Soumya Saha on 25 April, 2017

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse
liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
prosecution;

[c] not leave the territory of India without prior
permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

[d] appear before the Investigation Officer concerned,
as and when required for investigation purpose and
attend Court concerned regularly.

[e] furnish the present address of residence along with
the proof to the I.O. concerned and also to the Court
at the time of execution of the bond and shall not
change the residence without prior permission of
Sessions Court concerned;

5. The competent authority will release the applicant only if
the applicant is not required in connection with any other
offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above
conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be
free to take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be
executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the
case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify
and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with
law. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this
stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on

Page 2 of 3

HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Thu Jun 29 02:18:04 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/14641/2017 ORDER

bail.

6. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct
service is permitted.

(S.H.VORA, J.)
Hitesh

Page 3 of 3

HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Thu Jun 29 02:18:04 IST 2017

READ  Dr.Girish Bhardwaj vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2014

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *