Mohan Lal And Ans vs State on 29 June, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT
JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 3 / 2004
1. Mohan Lal

2. Mukesh

Both sons of Shri Ramprasad, by caste Swami, Residents of

Swamiyo Ka Mohalla, Scheme No.4, Alwar (Raj.)

—-Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan, through PP

—-Respondent

__
For Petitioner(s) : None present
For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
29/06/2017

Both the accused petitioner are present in Court. It is stated

that they have already deposited Rs. 2,000/- each as

compensation in terms of the directions issued by the Court on

17.05.2004. The petitioners have already been acquitted of

offence under Section 354 IPC and were granted probation in

terms of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act.

For conviction under Section 323 IPC, the fine of Rs. 5,000/-

each imposed by the appellate Court appears to be on the higher

side. Because amount of 2,000/- has already been deposited by

the accused petitioners, I find it to be sufficient amount as

penalty. The petitioners are not required to further deposit any
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-3/2004]

additional amount. The order passed by the appellate Court dated

18.10.2003, is modified as stated above.

The revision petition stands disposed of.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)J.

Arun/34

READ  Sri Arunava Dasgupta-vs-The State Of West Bengal on 18 July, 1996

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *