HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 1261 / 2016
1. Rajjak @ Saddam Husain S/o Iqbal Khan, by caste Sherani
Muslim, resident of Village Sherani Abad, P.S. Khunkhuna,
Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Raj.)
2. Smt. Muskan Bano @ Gulshan @ Guli W/o Akhtar Khan, R/o
Village Sherani Abad, P.S. Khunkhuna, Tehsil Didwana,
District Nagaur (Raj.)
—-Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan
2. Mohammad Rafiq S/o Lal Khan, B/c Sherani, R/o Village
Sherani Abad, P.S. Khunkhuna, Tehsil Didwana, District
Nagaur (Raj.)
—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : None present.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.O.P.Rathi, P.P.
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
13/07/2017
The petitioners have been charged by the trial court for the
offences under Sections 498A and 307 I.P.C. They have
approached this Court by way of the instant revision in order to
challenge the order dated 26.7.2016 passed by learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Didwana, District Nagaur.
Having considered the grounds raised in the revision petition
and after going through the impugned order, it is apparent that
the petitioner Rajjak @ Saddam being the husband of the victim
Smt.Barkat Bano is alleged to have stabbed her on the abdomen
by a knife. She clearly alleged in her statement that the accused
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-1261/2016]
used to harass and humiliate her.
In this background, I am of the firm opinion that the trial
court committed no illegality, irregularity or perversity directing
framing of charges against the petitioners for the above offences.
The trial court examined the entire material available on record in
detail and then passed a well reasoned order framing charges
against the accused petitioners in the above terms and
simultaneously, discharged the two accused Iqbal and Jubaida
from the offences.
The impugned order does not suffer from any shortcoming
factual or legal so as to require interference.
Consequently, the instant revision is hereby dismissed as
being devoid of merit.
(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.
/tarun goyal/
