Name And Addresss Of The vs By Advs.Sri.P.M.Abdul Jaleel … on 13 June, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/8TH ASHADHA, 1939

Crl.MC.No. 4315 of 2017 (H)
—————————

IN CC 1098/2015 of ADDL.C.J.M., ERNAKULAM
CRIME NO. 208/2010 OF ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM

NAME AND ADDRESSS OF THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1:
———————————————-

LAIJU,
AGED 45 YEARS,
S/O RAJARAM,
CHAKKALAKKAL HOUSE, P.C.ROAD, IIIRD AVENUE,
KALOOR P.O., ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KOCHI-682017.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.ABDUL JALEEL (KODUNGALLUR)
SRI.T.V.SHAJI

RESPONDENTS/STATE DE FACTO COMPLAINANT :
——————————————-

1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION THROUGH
THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM-682031.

2. NITHA DAS,
AGED 37 YEARS,
D/O LATE DASAN,
PAREKKATTU HOUSE, B.M.C.P.O., THRIKKAKKARA, KOCHI-682021.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.E.C. BINEESH

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 4315 of 2017 (H)
—————————

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–

ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.174/2012 ON THE
FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT
(ECONOMIC OFFENCES) ERNAKULAM. NOW PENDING AS
C.C.1098/2015 ON THE FILE THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM.

ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION AGREEMENT
DATED 13.6.2017 SINGED BY THE PETITIONER AND
RESPONDENT 2.

ANNEXURE A3 AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY RESPONDENT 2.

RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS: NIL
———————–

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

DST

B. SUDHEENDRAKUMAR,J.

Crl.M.C.No. 4315 of 2017
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2017

O R D E R

The petitioner is the 1st accused in C.C.

No.1098 of 2015 on the files of the court below. The

offences alleged are the offences punishable under

Sections 498A, 323, 325, 341 and 294(b) read with

Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard.

3. It has been submitted by the learned

counsel for the parties and the learned Public

Prosecutor that the matter has been settled between

the parties. The 2nd respondent, who is the de facto

complainant, filed affidavit stating that the matter

has been settled and hence she has no further

grievance against the petitioner.

4. The above dispute arose out of family

relationship. Therefore, since the matter has been

settled between the parties, I am inclined to quash

Crl.M.C.No. 4315 of 2017

-: 2 :-

Annexure-A1 final report and further proceedings

against the petitioner in C.C.No.1098 of 2015 on the

files of the court below, in exercise of the

inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 to meet the ends of justice

and accordingly, I order so.

In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed.

Sd/-

B. SUDHEENDRAKUMAR
JUDGE

DST

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *