IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/8TH ASHADHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 4321 of 2017 (A)
—————————
IN CC 461/2015 of J.M.F.C.,MALAPPURAM
CRIME NO. 3/2015 OF KONDOTTY POLICE STATION , MALAPPURAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :
———————-
1. ABDUL NASAR,
AGED 30 YEARS,
S/O MUHAMMED, PALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
THRIPPANACHI P.O., KUZHIMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. PAATHUMMA,
AGED 51 YEARS,
W/O MUHAMMED, PALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
THRIPPANACHI P.O., KUZHIMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
3. MUHAMMED,
AGED 41 YEARS,
S/O UNNIMOIN,
PADINJARETHODI HOUSE,
NEAR ITI, UNNUPUARAM P.O.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN
RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DE FACTO COMPLAINANT :
———————————————-
1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM-682031.
(CRIME NO.3/2015 OF KONDOTTY POLICE STATION IN
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT)
2. NASEERA,
AGED 23 YEARS,
W/O ABDUL NASAR,
KUZHIMANNA AMSOM,
KUZHIMANNA P.O., PALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KONDOTTY TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673641.
R2 BY ADV. SMT.ANJU CLETUS
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.E.C. BINEESH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 4321 of 2017 (A)
—————————
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.3/2015 OF KONDOTTY POLICE
STATION.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.3/2015 OF KONDOTTY
POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A3 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY 2ND RESPONDENT DATED
30.03.2017.
RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS: NIL
———————-
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
DST
B. SUDHEENDRAKUMAR,J.
Crl.M.C.No. 4321 of 2017
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2017
O R D E R
Petitioners are accused in C.C. No.461 of 2015
on the files of the court below. The offences
alleged are punishable under Sections 294(b), 323,
406, 506(i) and 498A read with Section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code.
2. Heard.
3. It has been submitted by the learned
counsel for the parties and the learned Public
Prosecutor that the matter has been settled between
the parties. The 2nd respondent, who is the de facto
complainant, filed affidavit stating that the matter
has been settled between the parties and hence she
has no further grievance against the petitioners.
4. The above dispute arose out of
matrimonial relationship. Therefore, since the
matter has been settled between the parties, I am
Crl.M.C.No. 4321 of 2017
-: 2 :-
inclined to quash Annexure-A2 final report and
further proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.
No.461 of 2015 on the files of the court below, in
exercise of the inherent power under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to meet the
ends of justice and accordingly, I order so.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed.
Sd/-
B. SUDHEENDRAKUMAR
JUDGE
DST
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
