IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.16832 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -174 Year- 2012 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR CITY District-
MUZAFFARPUR
1. Sunil Kumar Sah @ Sunil Kumar
2. Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Sah @ Anil Kumar
3. Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Sah
All are sons of late Chaturbhuj Sah, Resident of Village – Saraiyaganj, Nunphar,
Behind of Mega Bazar, P.S. – Muzaffarpur Town, Dist. – Muzaffarpur.
…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Tamanna Khatoon @ Sweta Devi, daughter of Md.Alam, r/o village Sadatpur
Kanti, P.S. Kanti, Distt. Muzaffarpur.
…. …. Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Udit Narayan Singh, Advocate.
Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, A.P.P.
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 14-07-2017
1. The petitioner has challenged the order of
cognizance dated 6.3.2014 passed by the learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, by which the learned Magistrate took
cognizance against the petitioners in connection with Muzaffarpur
Town P.S. Case No. 174 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 341,
323 and 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The informant has alleged that she was living with
petitioner No. 1 as husband and wife for the last three years and from
their wedlock, one girl child was born. Thereafter, the petitioner No. 1
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16832 of 2014 dt.14-07-2017
2/3
wanted to dissolve the relationship with her and performed another
marriage. Thereafter, the petitioner No. 1 along with his other brother
Anil Sah and Deepak Kumar assaulted the informant and forcibly
ousted her from matrimonial home.
3. From the impugned order, it appears that police
after investigation found the case true and filed charge sheet against
all the petitioners. The learned Magistrate has on the basis of
allegation in the First Information Report and materials available in
the case diary, found sufficient material to take cognizance against the
petitioner for the offence under Sections 341, 323 and 498A/34 of the
Indian Penal Code.
4. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
wife (informant) was live in relationship. She has been married with
another person which is apparent from Annexure-2.
5. It is settled law that learned Magistrate is not
required to see the defence of the petitioners at the time of taking
cognizance. The cognizance can be taken even if prima facie case is
made out against the accused persons.
6. In the instant case, the police after investigation
has found the case true and filed charge sheet against the petitioners.
Thereafter, the cognizance has been taken by the learned Magistrate
on the basis of allegation in the written report and the materials
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16832 of 2014 dt.14-07-2017
3/3
available in the case diary.
7. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere in
the order of cognizance.
8. This Criminal Miscellaneous application is
accordingly dismissed.
9. The petitioner is given liberty to raise all the points
as raised in this Criminal Miscellaneous application at the time of
framing of charge in the court below which shall be disposed off by
the court below in accordance with law without being prejudiced by
this order.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
S.Ali/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N.A
Uploading Date 21/07/2017
Transmission 21/07/2017
Date