IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/8TH ASHADHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 3133 of 2017 ()
—————————
CRIME NO. 236/2015 OF KONDOTTY POLICE STATION , MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
———————
1.SASI
S/O. SREEDHARAN,
KONJALATH VEEDU, PUTHUKKODE P.O.,
PERINGAVU, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. SATHYAN,
S/O. SREEDHARAN,
KONJALATH VEEDU, PUTHUKKODE P.O.,
PERINGAVU, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
3. SREEDHARAN,
S/O. NAGAN,
KONJALATH VEEDU, PUTHUKKODE P.O.,
PERINGAVU, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
——————————————
1. THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
KOCHI – 682 031 – THROUGH
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KONDOTTY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. ASARANI,
W/O. SASI
UNUKKANCHERYTHAZHAM HOUSE,
KUTTIKATTOOR P.O., KOZHIKODE TALUK,
KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT, PIN : 673 008.
R2 BY ADV. SMT.K.NISHA
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.K. PRASAD
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 29-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 3133 of 2017 ()
—————————
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–
ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME NO.
236/2015 OF THE KONDOTTY POLICE STATION,
MALAPPURAM DITRICT DT. 7.9.2016.
ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT
SWORN TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED
5.4.2017.
RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
————————————————-
Crl.M.C. No. 3133 of 2017
————————————————-
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2017
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused in Crime No. 236
of 2015 of Kondotty Police Station, registered for the
offences under Sections 323, 324, 354 and 498A read with
Section 34 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for
the parties and the learned Public Prosecutor that the
matter has been settled between the parties and the second
respondent is presently residing with the first petitioner,
who is her husband, under one roof. The second
respondent filed affidavit stating that the matter has been
settled between the parties and hence, she has no further
grievance against the petitioners. The above dispute arose
-2-
Crl.M.C. No. 3133 of 2017
out of matrimonial relationship. Therefore, since the
matter has been settled between the parties, I am inclined
to quash Annexure -A FIR and further proceedings against
the petitioners in Crime No. 236 of 2015 of Kondotty
Police Station, in exercise of the inherent power under
Section 482 Cr.P.C., to meet the ends of justice and
accordingly, I order so.
In the result, this Crl. M.C. Stands allowed.
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE.
ani/
