Cc 986/2016 Of J.M.F.C.-Ii vs Linesh on 25 June, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2017/20TH ASHADHA, 1939

Crl.MC.No. 4542 of 2017 ()
—————————
CC 986/2016 of J.M.F.C.-II,PERINTHALMANNA
CRIME NO. 317/2016 OF WANDOOR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
———————

1. LINESH,
AGED 31 YEARS,S/O NARAYANAN,KODUVALLLI HOUSE,
PARAKKULAM,THACHANGOTTU,VAANIYAMBALAM.

2. LEELA,
AGED 53 YEARS,W/O.NARAYANAN,KODUVALLLI HOUSE,
PARAKKULAM,THACHANGOTTU,VAANIYAMBALAM.

3. LIJINA,
AGED 26 YEARS,D/O NARAYANAN,KODUVALLLI HOUSE,
PARAKKULAM,THACHANGOTTU,VAANIYAMBALAM.

BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN

RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:
———————————————

1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM-682031.

2. GAMAYA,
AGED 21 YEARS,D/O.SREEDHARAN,KLARIYIL HOUSE,
NADUVATH.P.O-679328,WANDOOR,NILAMBUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

R2 BY ADV. SMT.ANJU CLETUS
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. M.K. PUSHPALATHA

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 11-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 4542 of 2017 ()
—————————

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–

ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME
NO.317/2016 OF WANDOOR POLICE STATION

ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF FINAL REPORT
IN CRIME NO.317/2016 OF WANDOOR POLICE
STATION

ANNEXURE A3 THE AFFIDAVTI SWORN IN BY
2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.06.2017.

RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

————————————————-
Crl.M.C. No. 4542 of 2017
————————————————-

Dated this the 11th day of July, 2017

ORDER

The petitioners are the accused in C.C. No. 986 of

2016 on the files of the court below. The offences alleged

are offences under Sections 498A and 406 read with

Section 34 IPC.

2. Heard.

3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

the parties and the learned Public Prosecutor that the

matter has been settled between the parties. The 2nd

respondent, who is the de facto complainant, filed affidavit

stating that the matter has been settled between the parties

and she has no further grievance against the petitioners.

The above dispute arose out of matrimonial relationship.

Therefore, since the matter has been settled between the

-2-

Crl.M.C. No. 4257 of 2017

parties, I am of the view that quashing the said offences

would secure the ends of justice. For the said reason, I am

inclined to quash Annexure-A2 final report and further

proceedings against the petitioners in C.C. No. 986 of 2016

on the files of the court below, in exercise of the inherent

power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to meet the ends of

justice and accordingly, I order so.

In the result, this Crl. M.C. Stands allowed.

Sd/- B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,
JUDGE.

ani/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *