Shibina Sharaf vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 19 June, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2017/2ND SRAVANA, 1939

WP(C).No. 23077 of 2017 (H)
—————————-
PETITIONER(S):
————-
SHIBINA SHARAF, AGED 26 YEARS, D/O. SHARAFUDDIN,
SHIBINA MANZIL, PANGALUKADU,
KADAKKAL, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK,PULIPPARADISTRICT.
P.O.,
KOLLAM

BY ADV. SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH
RESPONDENT(S):
————–
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
PEROORKKADA POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

2. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. SHAN, S/O. IBRAHIMKUTTY, AGED 34 YEARS,
INSHAJ HOUSE, PATHIRAPPALLY HOUSE,
MUKKOLA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4. NASEEMA IBRAHIM, W/O. IBRAHIM, AGED 58 YEARS,
INSHAJ MANZIL, PATHIRAPPALLY,
MUKKOLA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

5. IBRAHIMKUTTY MANZIL
AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL KAHADER,
PATHIRAPPALLY, MUKKOLA P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, INSHAJ MANZIL.

6. SHAMNA SHIJIL
AGED 30, D/O. IBRAHIMKUTTY INSHAJ MANZIL MANZIL,
PATHIRAPPALLY, MUKKOLA P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. E.C. BINEESH

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 24-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 23077 of 2017 (H)
—————————-

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–

EXHIBIT P1
DATED 19.6.2017TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLANT
SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER
BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DTED
06.7.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE
THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT,
ACKNOWLEDGING THE SENDING OF THE EXT.P2.

RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–

/TRUECOPY/

P.S. TOJUDGE

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

————————————————-
W.P. (C ) No. 23077 of 2017
————————————————-

Dated this the 24th day of July, 2017

JUDGMENT

When this matter has been taken up for admission, the

learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that

Crime No. 1447 of 2017 of Peroorkkada Police Station was

registered on the basis of Ext. P1 complaint for offences

punishable under Sections 323 and 498A read with Section

34 IPC.

In view of the above submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor, nothing survives to be decided in this Writ

Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed.

Sd/- B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,
JUDGE.

ani/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *