Cc 208/2013 Of J.M.F.C. vs By Adv. Sri.M.Dinesh on 23 May, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/19TH JYAISHTA, 1939

Crl.MC.No. 3731 of 2017 ()
—————————
CC 208/2013 of J.M.F.C.,VARKALA
CRIME NO. 73/2013 OF VARKALA POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANDAPURAM

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
————————————–

SANOOJ
AGED 40, S/O.ABDUL KABEER,
A.K.MANZIL, NEAR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL,
NADAYARA, VARKALA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.M.DINESH

RESPONDENT(S)/STATE DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:
————————————————————————-

1. STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM, PIN: 682 031.

2. ANITA
AGED 38, D/O.IBRAHIM KUTTY,
ANIL HOUSE, PALLIMUKKU,
KOLLAM DISTRICT.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.C.S.SUMESH
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI E C BINEESH

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-06-
2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 3731 of 2017 ()
—————————

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
——————————–

ANNEXURE-A1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.73/2013 OF VARKALA
POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE-A2: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.73/2013 OF
VARKALA POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE-A3: TRUE COPY OF COMPROMISE PETITION FILED BY PETITIONER AND
2ND RESPONDENT IN O.P.NO.947/2013 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY
COURT, KOLLAM DATED 23.5.2017.

ANNEXURE-A4: ATTESTED AFFIDAVIT OF 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 23.5.2017.

RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS : NIL
————————————-

// True Copy //

PA to Judge

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – — – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – –
Crl.M.C. No.3731 of 2017
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 9th day of June 2017

O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.208 of 2013

on the files of the court below. The offence alleged as per

Annexure-A2 final report is the offence under Section

498A I.P.C.

2. The second respondent is the de-facto complainant

in this case.

3. Heard.

4. The learned counsel for the parties and the learned

Public Prosecutor have submitted that the matter has been

settled between the parties. The second respondent filed

affidavit stating that the matter has been settled between

the parties and hence, she has no further grievance against

the petitioner. The above dispute arose out of family

Crl.M.C.3731/2017
-: 2 :-

relationship. Therefore, since the matter has been settled

between the parties, quashing the said offence would

secure the ends of justice. For the said reason, I am

inclined to quash Annexure-A2 final report and further

proceedings against the petitioner in C.C. No.208/2013 on

the files of the court below, in exercise of the inherent

power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to meet the ends of

justice and accordingly, I order so.

In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed.

Sd/-

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,
JUDGE
dl/12.6.2017

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *