223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Criminal Misc. M- No. 23886 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : July 26, 2017
State of Haryana and another ….Respondents
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.
Ms. Vandana, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
LISA GILL, J.
The petitioner prays for concession of anticipatory bail in FIR
No. 210 dated 17.05.2017 registered under Sections 498A, 406, 506, 323/34
at Police Station Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Nagar, Faridabad.
It is submitted that the matter has been amicably resolved
between the petitioner and the complainant – respondent No. 2 yesterday
itself i.e. 25.07.2017.
Settlement dated 25.07.2017 detailing the terms and conditions
thereof filed in Court today, is taken on record subject to just exceptions. It
is submitted that in terms of the said settlement, a sum of `9 lakhs by way of
demand draft has been handed over to respondent No. 2. A petition under
Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short – ‘the Act’) shall be
filed by the parties. The remaining amount of `2 lakhs shall be handed over
1 of 2
30-07-2017 17:20:02 :::
Criminal Misc. M- No. 23886 of 2017 (OM) -2-
by the petitioner to respondent No. 2 at the time of recording of statements
of the parties at second motion in the petition under Section 13B of the Act.
Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 affirms and verifies the
factum of settlement between the parties. It is submitted that in view of the
said settlement, respondent No. 2 has no objection if this petition is allowed
subject to strict adherence to the terms and conditions of the agreement by
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above
especially the settlement arrived at between the parties, it is considered just
and expedient to allow this petition.
In the event of his arrest, petitioner be released on bail to the
satisfaction of Investigating Officer. He shall join investigation as may be
required. Petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated in Section
Liberty is afforded to respondent No. 2 to move an appropriate
application in case the terms and conditions of the settlement are not
adhered to by the petitioner.
July 26, 2017 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
30-07-2017 17:20:03 :::