Smt. Farzana vs State & Ors on 8 August, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 394 / 1996
Smt. Farzana D/o Mohd. Nisar by caste Muslim, resident of 255,
Zakir Hussain Colony, Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur.

—-Petitioner
Versus

1. State of Rajasthan

2. Abdul Wahab s/o Ajijurrehman,

3. Abdul Tawab s/o Abdul Wahab,

4. Imran s/o Abdul Wahab,

5. Abdul Wakil s/o Abdul Wahab,

6. Smt. Shamima w/o Abdul Wahab,

7. Smt. Shahnaz D/o Abdul Wahab,
All by caste Muslims, Zakir Hussain Colony, Pratap Nagar,
Jodhpur.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : None.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Bhardwaj, PP.
__
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Order
08/08/2017

1. The petitioner is the complainant. She is aggrieved by the

impugned order under which the learned trial Judge has

discharged the accused of having committed an offence

punishable under section 498A, 365 511 IPC. The grounds of

the discharge are that the petitioners have already lodged a

complaint for an offence punishable under Section 498A IPC

against the accused. Prima facie, no case was made out to take

cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 365/511 IPC.

(2 of 2)
[CRLR-394/1996]

2. Unfortunately, none appears for the petitioner for hearing

today. Thus, the petition is dismissed in default.

(PRADEEP NANDRAJOG)CJ.

Mohit Tak

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *