Raj Kumar vs Neelam on 16 August, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
126

CR No.3342 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision: 16.08.2017

Raj Kumar …… Petitioner

Versus

Neelam …… Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:- Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate, for
Mr. R.D. Yadav, Advocate
for the petitioner.

*****

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (ORAL)

Husband is in revision petition against the order passed by

District Judge, Narnaul fixing maintenance pendente lite @ ` 7,000/- per

month.

It is not in dispute that the petitioner-husband is serving in

CRPF and his salary is more than ` 30,000/- per month. The District Judge

has fixed the maintenance only ` 7,000/-. Hence, there is no scope for

interference.

Revision petition is dismissed.

( ANIL KSHETARPAL )
16.08.2017 JUDGE
Dinesh Bansal

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No

Whether Reportable Yes / No

1 of 1
19-08-2017 15:19:57 :::

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *