Jagjeet Singh & Ors vs State & Anr on 25 August, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2681 / 2017

1. Jagjeet Singh Rao S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 40 Years

2. Manjeet Singh Rao S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 42 Years

3. Mohan Singh Rao S/o Madho Singh, Aged About 72 Years,
All Are R/o 941/45, Near Karpal Nagar, Railway Crossing,
Kalyanipura Gulabbadi, Ajmer.

—-Petitioners
Versus

1. The State of Rajasthan Through the Public Prosecutor.

2. Seema Kanwar Rao W/o Jagjeet Singh D/o Sohan Singh, R/o
Village Chandariya, Chitorgarh.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Rajeev Purohit
For Respondent(s) :Mr. MS Panwar, PP
__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
25/08/2017

1. Petitioner has preferred this misc. petition under

Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.216/2017, P.S.

Chandariya, Chitorghar for the offence under Section 498A and

406 of IPC against the petitioners.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners want to submit a representation

alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned

investigating authority.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the

petitioners submit a representation along with all the necessary
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2681/2017]

documents before the concerned investigating authority within a

period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered

and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the

investigation.

4. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned

Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a

direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the

petitioners submit a representation along with all the necessary

documents before it within a period of ten days from today, then

the same shall be considered and decided before completing the

investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the

assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor. However, if

during the investigation, the concerned investigating authority

needs to arrest the petitioners, then the petitioners shall be given

15 days notice before making such arrest. The petitioners shall be

at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises.

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

sudheer

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *