HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 6473 / 2017
Bhagwana Ram S/o Sh. Sukhram, By Caste Vishnoi, Resident of
Khara. Presently Working As Teacher At Govt. Upper Primary
School, Mamanadi, Savdi, Tehsil Bagoda, District Jalore (Raj.)
State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor.
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vineet Jain
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Awasthi, PP
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the
petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.159/2017, Police Station Bhinmal, District Jalore for the
offences under Sections 406 IPC Section 3/7 of Essential
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grain
which was to be distributed through public distribution system and
mid-day meal was recovered from the house of one Hari Ram.
Although Hari Ram is a relative of the petitioner but there is no
recovery from the house of petitioner which is adjoining to the
house of Hari Ram. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in
the present case.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
(2 of 2)
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and
upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this
Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory
bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of petitioner Bhagwana Ram S/o
Sukhram, in connection with F.I.R. No.159/2017, Police Station
Bhinmal District Jalore, the petitioner shall be released on bail;
provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of
the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following
(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J.