1
61.
08.09.2017
.
ap C.R.M. 8858 of 2017
In the matter of: an application for bail under Section 439 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04.09.2017 in connection with
Shyampur Police Station Case No. 356 of 2017 dated 01.08.2017
under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections
3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act added Section 304B/302 of the
Indian Penal Code.
And
In re: Renuka Pramanick Ors. … Petitioners
Ms. Mousumi Mitra,
Mr. Sarwar Jahan. …… for the petitioners
Mr. Saswato Gopal Mukherjee, Ld. PP
Mrs. Amita Gaur. …. for the State
Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respective parties. Perused the case diary.
The petitioners are in custody for 39 days. Investigation is in
progress.
On perusal of the statement made by the victim housewife in
presence of the Medical Officer, Medical College and Hospital,
Calcutta, which is at page 26 of the case diary and the roles
attributed to the petitioner nos.1 and 2, namely, Renuka Pramanick
and Astomi Das @ Teri, we are not inclined to allow their prayer for
granting bail.
However, so far as the petitioner no.3 is concerned, our
attentions have not been drawn from the side of the State towards
any materials in the case diary showing necessity in favour of further
2
custodial detention of the petitioner no.3 or that in the event, bail is
granted in her favour, she is likely to abscond. Therefore, we are
inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner no.3, namely, Shyamali
Pramanick for granting bail.
Let the petitioner no.3, namely, Shyamali Pramanick, be
released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two
sureties of Rs.5,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the
satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Uluberia, Howrah.
The application for bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Debasish Kar Gupta, J.)
(Amitabha Chatterjee, J.)