201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Criminal Misc. No.M- 5179 of 2016 (OM)
Date of decision : September 12, 2017
Khushpal Singh @ Rehbar Khan …..Petitioner
State of Haryana and another ….Respondents
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay K. Saini, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate
for respondent No. 2.
LISA GILL, J.
Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner in FIR No. 355 dated 15.12.2015 registered under Sections 420,
494, 323, 406, 498A, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station Pinjore.
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the
last date of hearing. Interim order dated 19.02.2016 was vacated.
Today, despite the matter having been called twice, none
appears on behalf of the petitioner.
The following order was passed by this Court on 27.07.2017:-
” It is noticed that interim relief was afforded to the
petitioner in this petition seeking anticipatory bail in FIR
No.355 dated 15.12.2016 under Sections
420/494/323/406/498A/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station
Pinjore. The matter was placed before the Mediation and
Conciliation Centre of this Court. Mediation between the
parties failed, however efforts were made to amicably resolve
the dispute between the parties. The following order was passed
on 08.05.2017 by this Court:-
1 of 2
17-09-2017 21:43:05 :::
Criminal Misc. No.M- 5179 of 2016 (OM) -2-
“The petitioner as well as respondent No. 2, duly
identified by their counsel, are present in Court. It is
agreed that it will not be possible for petitioner No.1 and
respondent No. 2 to live together any longer. They have
decided to part ways. Respondent No. 2 has agreed to
accept a sum of ` 4 lakhs as full and final settlement of
all her claims-past, present and future which she may
have against the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent
No. 2 pray for a short adjournment to place on record the
terms and conditions of the settlement.
List on 18.05.2017.”
The matter was adjourned on 18.05.2017 on request of
learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2 to
enable them to place on record the complete terms and
conditions arrived at between the parties.
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner
on the last date of hearing i.e., 17.07.2017. It is categorically
stated by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that the
petitioner has backed out of the commitment made and he is
not coming forward. Furthermore, it is informed by learned
counsel for the State that the petitioner is not joining
Today despite the matter having been called out twice,
none appears on behalf of the petitioner neither the petitioner is
present in person.
In this view of the matter, interim order dated 19.02.2016
List on 12.09.2017 for arguments.”
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case as are
evident from order dated 27.07.2017, this petition is dismissed.
September 12, 2017 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
17-09-2017 21:43:06 :::