227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Criminal Misc. No. M- 34409 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : September 22, 2017
Vishal Seth …..Petitioner
State of Punjab ….Respondents
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Devinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab.
LISA GILL, J.
The petitioner prays for bail pending trial in FIR No. 20 dated
It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in
this case. The deceased committed suicide when she was in her parental
home. She was with her parents for the last ten days before the unfortunate
incident. This fact is so reflected in the FIR itself.
While referring to suicide note dated 06.04.2016 (Annexure
P-4), learned counsel for the petitioner argues that ingredients of offence
made out in any manner. There is no mention of any demand of dowry or
harassment being meted out to the deceased neither is there any indication
of instigation or abetment of suicide by the petitioner. It is further submitted
that the deceased had suicidal tendencies and a certain psychological
disorder, which led to the unfortunate incident of her committing suicide.
1 of 3
24-09-2017 09:19:27 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 34409 of 2017 (OM) -2-
Learned counsel refers to alleged conversations between the
deceased and her mother as well as the petitioner to urge that none of the
allegations levelled in FIR are correct. The deceased was not driven out of
the matrimonial home and neither was she subjected to any ill-treatment at
the hands of the petitioner. She had left the matrimonial home of her own
accord. Moreover, the material witnesses, it is submitted, have been
examined before the learned trial Court. The petitioner is not involved in
any other criminal case. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the State while not denying that the
deceased committed suicide while she was in her parental home, submits
that it is due to harassment meted out to her that she left the matrimonial
home and was at her parental home. The veracity, effect or otherwise of the
alleged conversations referred to above shall be considered by the learned
trial Court. However, suicide note dated 06.04.2016 is not in dispute. It is
verified by learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI
Balwinder Singh, that the complainant as well as the material witnesses
have since testified before the learned trial court. The petitioner is not
involved in any other criminal case.
There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is
likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from
deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Trial, in this case, is not
likely to conclude in the near future.
No useful purpose shall be served by keeping the petitioner
incarcerated any longer. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted
2 of 3
24-09-2017 09:19:28 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 34409 of 2017 (OM) -3-
above but without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is
considered just and expedient to allow this petition.
Consequently, the petitioner be released on bail pending trial
subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds and surety to the satisfaction of
the learned trial Court.
It is reiterated that none of the observations made herein above
are a reflection on the merits of the case and shall have no bearing on the
September 22, 2017 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
3 of 3
24-09-2017 09:19:28 :::