Chami vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 17 July, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN

WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2017/1ST BHADRA, 1939

WP(Crl.).No. 317 of 2017 (S)
—————————–

PETITIONER:
———-

CHAMI, AGED 47 YEARS,
S/O RAMAN, NIRAKANNI HOUSE,
UMMANAZHI, POOLAPATTA,
OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN

RESPONDENTS:
———–

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KONGAD POLICE STATION,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT – 678 631.

2. DINESH KUMAR N, AGED 25 YEARS,
S/O.DEVAN, MAMBRATH VEEDU,
NEERAMKANNI HOUSE,
UMMANAZHI, POOLAPATTA,
OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD – 679 101.

BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.B.RAMANAND

THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
23-08-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(CRL.) NO.317 OF 2017
————————-

APPENDIX
——–

PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS
———————

P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 17/07/2017.

RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS:
———————

NIL

TRUE COPY

P.S TO JUDGE

A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J

P.SOMARAJAN, J
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
W.P.Crl No.317 of 2017
—————————————-
Dated this the 23rd day of August 2017

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner/father of the

detenue Karunya.N alleging that she is being illegally detained by

the 2nd respondent.

2. The detenue is produced before this Court. On our

interaction with her, she submitted that she is not being illegally

detained by the 2nd respondent. She had married the 2nd

respondent in a temple and a memorandum of registration of

marriage issued by the local authority has also been produced

before this Court. There is an averment in the original petition

that she has filed a complaint against the 2nd respondent under

Section 498A of the I.P.C. Though we enquired about the same,

according to her, the said complaint does not reflect the true

facts. She also submitted that her educational qualification

certificates are at her parental house.

W.P.(Crl) No.317/2017
2

3. Having regard to the factual situation that the detenue

had already married to the 2nd respondent and according to the

detenue, she is not being illegally detained, we do not think that

any direction, as sought for, can be granted.

This writ petition is dismissed.

(sd/-)
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)

(sd/-)

(P.SOMARAJAN, JUDGE)
jsr

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *