TA No.823 of 2017 (OM) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
TA No. 823 of 2017(OM)
Date of decision: 27.9.2017
Saneela ….Applicant
VERSUS
Stalin …..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Saini, Advocate for
Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate for the applicant.
REKHA MITTAL, J.(Oral)
The applicant prays for transfer of petition under Section 13
of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short ‘the Act’) titled Stalin Vs.
Saneela filed by respondent – husband from the Court of District Judge,
Family Court, Karnal to a Court of competent jurisdiction at Rohtak.
Counsel for the applicant has submitted that besides physical
distance of approximately 130 KMs between the two places, two litigations
initiated at the behest of applicant namely application under Section 125
Cr.P.C. and petition under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890
for custody of minor children are pending in the Court of District Judge,
Family Court Rohtak.
The two children for whose custody the applicant has invoked
the relevant provisions of Guardians and Wards Act are admittedly
residing at Karnal and being looked after by the respondent-husband. It
would be a moot point before the Court if the said petition can be tried by
the Court at Rohtak. The proceedings under Section 13 of the Act do not
require personal appearance of a party on each and every date of hearing.
1 of 2
30-09-2017 07:57:51 :::
TA No.823 of 2017 (OM) 2
Under the circumstances, it is appropriate that the petition is allowed to
continue at the place where the same is filed. However, applicant is at
liberty to file an appropriate application for grant of maintenance,
travelling expenses and issuance of other directions in the light of
judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Krishna Veni Nagam Vs.
Harish Nagam, 2017 (2) RCR (Civil) 358. In case such an application is
filed by the applicant, the same shall be disposed of by the Court below
before proceeding further with the matter.
With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed
of.
SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 (REKHA MITTAL)
‘D. Gulati’ JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : yes/no
Whether reportable : yes/no
2 of 2
30-09-2017 07:57:52 :::