Jitender vs Nitu on 29 September, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

218 FAO-M-8000-2014.
Decided on: September 29, 2017.

Jitender
.. Appellant
VERSUS

Nitu
.. Respondent
***
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

***
PRESENT Mr.Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate,
for the appellant.

Mr.Pankaj Middha, Advocate,
for the respondent-wife.

M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)

Counsel for the appellant submits that he has got no
instructions from the appellant and has not been able to contact the
appellant despite best efforts.

Notice issued to the appellant by the Court has been
received back with a report that his address is not complete though address
given is the same as per the memo of parties filed before the lower Court as
well as before this Court.

We are satisfied that the appellant-husband is not
interested in the appeal as he has made no attempt either to pursue the
appeal or to contact his counsel. He has also not paid the maintenance
pendente lite as ordered by this Court vide order dated 11.8.2017.

In view of said circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.

(M.M.S. BEDI)
JUDGE

September 29, 2017. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH)
raj arora JUDGE
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No
Whether reportable Yes / No
1 of 1
07-10-2017 02:52:21 :::

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *