SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Surta Ram & Anr vs State & Anr on 27 October, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3022 / 2017

1. Surta Ram S/o Uda Ram

2. Jhamku W/o Shri Surta Ram, Both R/o Pur, Tehsil Sanchore
Distt. Jalore.

—-Petitioners
Versus

1. State of Rajasthan

2. Heera Devi W/o Shri Bhera Ram, R/o Balana, Tehsil Sanchore,
District Jalore.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Teja Ram Choudhary
For Respondent(s) : Mr.V.S.Rajpurohit PP for the State.

Mr.Dinesh Vishnoi
__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
27/10/2017

1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

has been preferred for quashing FIR No.258/2017 registered at

Police Station, Sanchore, District Jalore for the offences under

Sections 498A, 406, 384 and 323 IPC.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners want to submit a representation

alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned

investigating authority.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the

petitioners submit a representation alongwith all the necessary

documents before the concerned investigating authority within a
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-3022/2017]

period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be

considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before

completing the investigation.

4. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned

Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a

direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the

petitioners submit a representation alongwith all the necessary

documents before it within a period of fifteen days from today,

then the same shall be considered and decided before completing

the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the

assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor. However, if

during the investigation, the concerned investigating authority

needs to arrest the petitioners, then the petitioners shall be given

15 days notice before making such arrest. The petitioners shall be

at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises.

However, it is made clear that the petitioners shall be required to

completely cooperate with the investigation.

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

Skant/-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation