State vs Vikram Singh & Ors on 1 November, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 463 / 2017
State of Rajasthan

—-Appellant
Versus

1. Vikram Singh S/o Jabbar Singh Ji

2. Kaniya Kanwar W/o Jabbar Singh Ji, Both the Accused
Respondents by Caste Rajput, Resident of Pawa, Police Station
Takhatgarh, Tehsil Sumerpur, District Pali.

3. Chhail Singh S/o Shri Gunesh Singh Ji, By Caste Rajput,
Resident of Gudiya Indrapura, Police Station Aahor, District Jalore
(Raj.).

—-Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 65 / 2017
Hem Singh S/o Shri Wagh Singh, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Rodla,
Tehsil Ahore, Distt. Jalore.

—-Appellant

Versus

1. State of Rajasthan

2. Chhail Singh S/o Shri Ganesh Singh, R/o Village Gudia,
Indrapura, Tehsil Police Station Ahore, Distt. Jalore.

3. Vikram Singh S/o Shri Jabbar Singh, R/o Village Pawa, Tehsil
Sumerpur, Distt. Pali.

4. Smt. Kanya Kanwar W/o Shri Jabbar Singh, R/o Village Pawa,
Tehsil Sumerpur, Distt. Pali. (respondent No. 2to 4 Accused).

—-Respondents
__
For Appellant(s) : Mr. L.R.Upadhyay and Mr. Ranjeet Singh
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
01/11/2017

Heard.

(2 of 2)

Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as

available on record and after perusing the impugned judgment, I

find sufficient ground to grant leave to the applicants to file

appeals against the acquittal of the respondents vide impugned

judgment dated 22.11.2016 passed by learned Addl. Sessions

Judge, Sumerpur whereby the accused respondents were

acquitted from the charge under Sections 498A, 306 and 120 B

IPC.

Accordingly, the applications for leave to appeal are allowed.

The memo of leave to appeals be treated as appeals and they be

registered as such. The accused respondents be summoned

through bailable warrant in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-.

A copy of the order be placed in each file.

(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.

/sushil/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *