217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM M-39724 of 2017 (OM)
Date of Decision: 30.10.2017.
Nirvail Singh @ Kala
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
… Respondents
CORAM : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan
Present : Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms. Anju Arora, Addl. AG Punjab.
Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate,
for respondent Nos. 2 3.
JITENDRA CHAUHAN.J.(ORAL)
The present petition has been filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C seeking bail in case FIR No.190 dated 11.09.2017 registered
under Section 354 IPC and Section 7 of Protection of Children from
Sexual Offences Act, 2012 at Police Station Jandiala, Amritsar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the
instant FIR is an outcome of misunderstanding between the parties. He
refers to Annexure P-2 to submit that the misunderstanding has now
been resolved.
On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes
the bail application.
Learned counsel for the complainant admits the
factum of compromise
1 of 2
04-11-2017 04:31:18 :::
CRM M-39724 of 2017 (2)
Heard.
Considering the fact that a compromise has been
reached at between the parties so, without commenting on the merits of
the case, this petition is allowed. The petitioner be admitted to bail
during the pendency of trial, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety
bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/duty Magistrate concerned.
Anything said herein above shall not be construed as
an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.
30.10.2017. (JITENDRA CHAUHAN)
SN JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
04-11-2017 04:31:20 :::
