Nirvail Singh @ Kala vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 30 October, 2017

217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

CRM M-39724 of 2017 (OM)
Date of Decision: 30.10.2017.

Nirvail Singh @ Kala
…Petitioner
Versus

State of Punjab and others
… Respondents

CORAM : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan

Present : Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate,
for the petitioner.

Ms. Anju Arora, Addl. AG Punjab.

Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate,
for respondent Nos. 2 3.

JITENDRA CHAUHAN.J.(ORAL)

The present petition has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C seeking bail in case FIR No.190 dated 11.09.2017 registered

under Section 354 IPC and Section 7 of Protection of Children from

Sexual Offences Act, 2012 at Police Station Jandiala, Amritsar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the

instant FIR is an outcome of misunderstanding between the parties. He

refers to Annexure P-2 to submit that the misunderstanding has now

been resolved.

On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes

the bail application.

Learned counsel for the complainant admits the

factum of compromise

1 of 2
04-11-2017 04:31:18 :::
CRM M-39724 of 2017 (2)

Heard.

Considering the fact that a compromise has been

reached at between the parties so, without commenting on the merits of

the case, this petition is allowed. The petitioner be admitted to bail

during the pendency of trial, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety

bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/duty Magistrate concerned.

Anything said herein above shall not be construed as

an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

30.10.2017. (JITENDRA CHAUHAN)
SN JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
04-11-2017 04:31:20 :::

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *