Ajeet Singh vs State on 14 November, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 10223 / 2017
Ajeet Singh S/o Sh. Shiv Singh, Aged About 49 Years, By Caste
Rajput, R/o Duplex Colony At Present Gangashahar Sarvsidhi
Nagar, Bikaner (Raj.). (Presently Lodged At Central Jail Bikaner)

—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan

—-Respondent
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaushal Gautam.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.S. Rathore, Public Prosecutor.
For Complainant(s) : Mr. M.K. Saini.

__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
14/11/2017

This is second bail application by petitioner under Section

439 Cr.P.C. arising out of FIR No.156/2017, registered at Mahila

Police Station, District Bikaner for offence under Sections 498A,

307 323 IPC. First bail application filed on behalf of petitioner

was dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh after

submission of charge-sheet in the matter.

Pressing this second bail application, it is argued by learned

counsel for the petitioner that now investigation has been

completed and charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter.

It is further argued by learned counsel that the report was lodged

by complainant due to some misunderstanding and now the

dispute has been sorted out between the spouses, therefore, in
(2 of 3)
[CRLMB-10223/2017]

that background, petitioner may be granted indulgence. It is also

argued by learned counsel that the complainant has not suffered

any bony injury, therefore, petitioner’s second bail plea, on the

strength of substantial change in the circumstances, requires

favourable consideration.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of

petitioner.

Learned counsel for complainant has submitted that the FIR

was lodged due to some misunderstanding and now dispute has

been sorted out, therefore, complainant is having no objection if

petitioner is released on bail.

I have given my anxious consideration to the arguments

advanced at the Bar and perused the materials available on record

including change in the circumstances sought to be canvassed by

learned counsel for the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,

without making any comment on merits, I feel persuaded to

enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Ajeet Singh S/o

Sh. Shiv Singh, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.156/2017,
(3 of 3)
[CRLMB-10223/2017]

Mahila Police Station, District Bikaner, may be released on bail;

provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two

surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned

trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all

dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(P.K. LOHRA)J.

Twinkle Singh/57

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *