Shankar Lal Vyas & Ors vs State & Anr on 8 November, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3902 / 2017

1. Shankar Lal Vyas S/o Shri Ratan Lal, by caste Brahmin, aged
about 65 years, R/o 798, Purani Aabadi, Opp. Rajendram
Secondary School, Sriganganagar.

2. Smt. Indira Vyas W/o Shankar Lal Vyas, by caste Brahmin,
aged about 58 years, R/o 798, Purani Aabadi, Opp. Rajendram
Secondary School, Sriganganagar.

3. Manish Vyas, S/o Shankar Lal Vyas, by caste Brahmin, aged
about 36 years, R/o 798, Purani Aabadi, Opp. Rajendram
Secondary School, Sriganganagar.

—-Petitioners
Versus

1. State of Rajasthan.

2. Smt. Rama Purohit W/o Shri Aashish Vyas, D/o Shri Santosh
Kumar Purohit, R/o Shale Ki Holi, Near Bhawani Shanker House,
Bikaner, District Bikaner.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. VK Bhadu.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Rajpurohit PP.

Mr. Rajesh Saharan.

__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
08/11/2017

1. The petitioners have preferred this misc. petition under

Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR No.180/2017,

registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Bikaner for the offence

under Sections 498A, 406 and 323 of IPC.

2. A joint prayer is made by learned counsel for the

petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent No.2 that a

compromise has been arrived and compromise has been

submitted here on the perusal of the Court.

(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-3902/2017]

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties submits

that the parties want to submit a representation alongwith all the

relevant documents including the compromise between the parties

before the concerned investigating authority.

4 Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the

parties submit a representation including the compromise between

the parties along with all the necessary documents before the

concerned investigating authority within a period of 15 days from

today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in

accordance with law, before completing the investigation.

5. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned

Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a

direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the

parties submit a representation along with all the necessary

documents including the compromise between the parties before it

within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be

considered and decided before completing the investigation,

strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by

the learned Public Prosecutor. However, if during the investigation,

the concerned investigating authority needs to arrest the

petitioners, then the petitioners shall be given 15 days notice

before making such arrest. The petitioners shall be at liberty to

approach this Court again, in case need arises. However, the

petitioners shall be required to completely cooperate with the

investigation.

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

ck

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *