Gursevak Singh & Ors vs State & Anr on 4 December, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2384 / 2017
1. Gursevak Singh Son of Gurjant Singh

2. Gurjant Singh S/o Preetam Singh

3. Sukhpal Kaur Wife of Gurjant Singh, All by Caste Jatsikh,
Residents of Ward No. 16, Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar.
—-Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan

2. Gurpreet Kaur Wife of Gursevak Singh, D/o Darshan Singh, By
Caste Jatsikh, Presently Resident of Ratanpuria, Tehsil Sangaria,
District Hanumangarh.
—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.K.Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S.Panwar, PP
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
04/12/2017

By way of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the

petitioners seek to assail the order dated 16.5.2017 passed by

learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangaria in Cr. Case No.

291/2017 whereby cognizance was taken against them for the

offence under Sections 498A, 406 and 323 IPC. The order under

challenge is revisable in view of the law as laid down by Hon’ble

Supreme Court in the case of Madhu Limaye Vs. State of

Maharashtra reported in 1978 AIR-47. That apart, the petitioners

can always raise their objections before the trial court at the stage

of framing charges.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2384/2017]

In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to exercise

inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. so as to

interfere in the impugned order at this stage.

Thus, the instant misc. petition is dismissed as being devoid

of merit.

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J.

/sushil/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *