SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Shalom Zeenath Taylor vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 December, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5th DAY OF DECEMBER 2017

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA

CRL.P. No.6365 OF 2017

BETWEEN:

SHALOM ZEENATH TAYLOR
W/O.GRAHAM STEPHEN TAYLOR
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RESIDING AT GOODNA,
QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA-4300

PRESENTLY AT:
NO.142, 2ND CROSS,
ASHRAYA LAYOTU,
T.C.PALYA MAIN ROAD,
ANANDAPURAM,
BENGALURU-560036. … PETITIONER

(By Sri. BHANU PRADEEP FOR SRI/SMT. UDITA RAMESH,
ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY WOMEN POLICE STATION,
HALASURGATE SUB-DIVISION,
HALASURGATE, CORPORATION CIRCLE
CUBBONPETE, NAGARATHPETE,
BENGALURU-560002.

2.SMT FARZANA SUBHAN
WIFE OF SLYED ABID,
AGED 42 YEARS
2

RESIDING AT NO.39, BELLAHALLI
KANNUR MAIN ROAD,
OPPOSITE MONICA GRANITE FACTORY,
BENGALURU-560064. … RESPONDENTS

(By Sri. SANDESH J. CHOUTA, SPP-II FOR R-1)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH
F.I.R AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CR.NO.17/2017
REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498A R/W 4 OF
D.P ACT , PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VI ACMM,
BANGALORE.

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Perused the first information report filed by

one Farzana Subhan/2nd respondent herein against the

petitioner and another. The complaint averment

discloses that there are certain allegations wherein it is

stated that the second respondent’s husband and the

petitioner herein had manhandled and harassed her

and abused her in filthy language etc.
3

3. It is submitted by the learned SPP-II that on

the basis of the above said first information report the

police have almost investigated the matter and charge

sheet is ready to be submitted to the Court.

4. At this juncture, this Court may not be in a

position to ascertain what are the materials that have

been collected by the police. Therefore, I am of the

opinion that at this stage, the first information report

itself cannot be quashed. However, it is made clear that

if the police file any adverse report against the petitioner

without any basis, the petitioner is at liberty to

approach this Court once again.

5. With that liberty, the present petition stands

disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE.

*alb/-.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please CLICK HERE to read Group Rules, If You agree then JOIN HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DVACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA24, 125 CrPc, 307, 313, 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509 etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh