SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rahul Kaushal vs State Of Punjab on 8 December, 2017

217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M- 27265 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : December 08, 2017

Rahul Kaushal …..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ….Respondent

CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present: Mr. A.S. Rai, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Rathore, DAG, Punjab.

***

LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 137 dated 17.05.2017 under Section 406/498A IPC

registered at Police Station City Barnala, District Barnala.

It is informed that the matter has been amicably resolved

during the pendency of this petition before the Mediation and Conciliation

Centre of this Court on 30.08.2017. Settlement/agreement dated 30.08.2017

is attached with the file of this case. It is informed that petition under

Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been filed. Part of the

settled amount has been handed over to the complainant. The petitioner

undertakes to abide by the terms and conditions of the settlement. It is, thus,

prayed that this petition be allowed.

Learned counsel for the complainant affirms and verifies the

averments as above as well as receipt of the part of the settled amount. It

is submitted that the complainant has no objection, in case, this petition is

1 of 2
10-12-2017 19:58:50 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 27265 of 2017 (OM) -2-

allowed subject to the petitioner adhering strictly to the terms and

conditions of the settlement.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Baldev

Singh, verifies that the petitioner has joined investigation.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, order dated 05.09.2017

is made absolute.

(Lisa Gill)
December 08, 2017 Judge
rts
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
10-12-2017 19:58:51 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please CLICK HERE to read Group Rules, If You agree then JOIN HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DVACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA24, 125 CrPc, 307, 313, 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509 etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh