SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Paramjit Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 7 December, 2017

CRM-M-10813 of 2016(OM) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-10813 of 2016(OM)
Date of Order: 07.12.2016

Paramjit Singh and another ..Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another
..Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present: Ms. Pinki Banwala, Advocate, for
Mr. J.S.Thind, Advocate,
for the petitioners.

Mr. K.S.Aulakh, AAG, Punjab

Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for respondent no.2.

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J. (Oral)

The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.166, dated

23.08.2014, registered under Sections 498A and 406 IPC Police

Station C-Division, District Amritsar City and all the consequent

proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written

compromise arrived at between the parties.

Report has been received from the trial Court after

statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise.

The trial Court has reported that the compromise is voluntarily,

without undue influence, pressure or coercion, and out of their free

will and consent. The trial court has also sent photocopies of

statements of parties.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that

1 of 2
10-12-2017 15:43:41 :::
CRM-M-10813 of 2016(OM) -2-

petitioners are the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only

aggrieved person in this FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR

pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and

the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in

Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2007

(3) RCR (Criminal), 1052, approved by Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian

Singh vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, the

instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent

proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the

petitioners.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the

terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

December 07, 2016 (ANITA CHAUDHRY)
nt JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
10-12-2017 15:43:42 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please CLICK HERE to read Rules of Group, If You agree then Message us on Above Number.

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DVACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA24, 125 CrPc, 307, 313, 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509 etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh