Parishit @ Lovely And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 7 December, 2017

CRM-M-3886 of 2016(OM) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-3886 of 2016(OM)
Date of Order: 07.12.2016

Parishit @ Lovely and others ..Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another
..Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present: Mr. Sunil K. Dhanda, Advocate, for
Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate,
for the petitioners.

Mr. Vikas Chopra, DAG, Punjab

Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate, for respondent no.2.

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J. (Oral)

The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.369, dated

05.11.2009, registered under Sections 498A, 406, 452, 323, 506 and

34 IPC, Police Station Saran, District Faridabad and all the

consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of

written compromise arrived at between the parties.

Report has been received from the trial Court after

statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise.

The trial Court has reported that the compromise has been arrived

between them out of their own sweet will, without any threat, coercion

or undue influence, genuine and valid. The trial court has also sent

photocopies of statements of parties.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that

1 of 2
10-12-2017 16:57:08 :::
CRM-M-3886 of 2016(OM) -2-

petitioners are the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only

aggrieved person in this FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR

pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and

the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in

Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2007

(3) RCR (Criminal), 1052, approved by Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian

Singh vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, the

instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent

proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the

petitioners.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the

terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

December 07, 2016 (ANITA CHAUDHRY)
nt JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
10-12-2017 16:57:09 :::

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *