Sukhmander Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 15 December, 2017

CRM No.M-39809 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No. M- 39809 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: December 15 , 2017.

Sukhmander Singh …… PETITIONER(s)


State of Punjab and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. J.S.Sekhon, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Mr. Rahul Rathore, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. H.R.Bhardwaj, Advocate
for respondent No.2.


Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.26 dated

03.02.2013 under Sections 406/498A IPC, registered at Police Station City

Ferozepur, District Ferozepur and all other consequential proceedings arising

therefrom on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties.

The abovesaid FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No.2

due to matrimonial discord with her husband i.e., petitioner No.1. With the

intervention of respectables and relatives, a compromise was arrived at between

the parties, the terms of which were reduced into writing on 07.10.2017

(Annexure P2).

It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as

1 of 4
23-12-2017 23:35:14 :::
CRM No.M-39809 of 2017

respondent No.2 that ex parte divorce granted to petitioner No.1 vide judgment

and decree dated 14.05.2015 has been accepted by respondent No.2. She has

agreed not to challenge the said decree. The settled amount as per the

compromise dated 07.10.2017 has since been handed over to respondent No.2.

This Court on 27.10.2017 directed the parties to appear before

learned trial court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements in respect to

the above-mentioned compromise. Learned trial court/Illaqa Magistrate was

directed to submit a report regarding the genuineness of the compromise, as to

whether it has been arrived at out of the free will and volition of the parties

without any coercion, fear or undue influence. Learned trial court/Illaqa

Magistrate was also directed to intimate whether any of the petitioners are

absconding/proclaimed offenders and whether any other case is pending against

them. Information was sought as to whether all affected persons are a party to

the settlement.

Pursuant to order dated 27.10.2017, the parties appeared before the

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur and their statements were recorded

on 06.11.2017. Respondent No.2 stated that the matter has been amicably

resolved by her with the petitioners out of her own free will without any

inducement, pressure, threat or coercion. Respondent No.2 further stated that

she has no objection in case the abovesaid FIR against the accused petitioners is

quashed. Statements of the petitioners in respect to the settlement was recorded

as well.

As per report dated 07.11.2017 received from the learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur, it is opined that the compromise between the

2 of 4
23-12-2017 23:35:15 :::
CRM No.M-39809 of 2017

parties is valid, genuine and voluntary, arrived at between them without any

pressure, threat or coercion from any quarter. None of the petitioners are reported

to be proclaimed offenders. Statements of the parties are appended alongwith

the said report.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 reaffirms and verifies the

factum of settlement between the parties. It is reiterated that respondent No.2 has

no objection to the quashing of the abovementioned FIR against all the


Learned counsel for the State submits that as the abovesaid FIR

arises out of a matrimonial dispute, the State has no objection to the quashing of

the FIR in question as well as all consequential proceedings on the basis of a

settlement arrived at between the parties.

In Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and

another 2007 (3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 1052, a five member Bench of this Court has

observed as under:-

“The compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of
harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the
power under
Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is used to
enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social
amity and reduces friction, then it truly is “finest hour of justice”.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in B.S.Joshi and others v. State of

Haryana, 2003(4) SCC 675 has observed that it becomes the duty of the Court

to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, it would be

in the interest of justice to quash the abovesaid FIR as no useful purpose would

be served by continuance of the present proceedings. It will merely lead to

3 of 4
23-12-2017 23:35:15 :::
CRM No.M-39809 of 2017

wastage of precious time of the court and would be an exercise in futility.

This petition is, thus, allowed and FIR No.26 dated 03.02.2013

under Sections 406/498A IPC, registered at Police Station City Ferozepur,

District Ferozepur alongwith all consequential proceedings are, hereby, quashed.

December 15 , 2017. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

4 of 4
23-12-2017 23:35:15 :::

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *