SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Govind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 January, 2018

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
M.Cr.C.No.27286/2017 (Govind vs. State of M.P.)

1

Indore, Dated: 05.01.2018
Shri Shailendra Shrivastava, learned counsel for the
applicant.
Shri Rajesh Joshi, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

This is first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail on behalf of the applicant. The applicant is in jail
since 20.09.2017 in connection with Crime No.467/2017
registered at Police Station- Pardeshipura, District- Indore for
offence punishable under Sections 324, 294, 354, 354D and 506
of IPC.

As per prosecution story, on 19.09.2017 at about 5:00 p.m.
the prosecutrix while coming back home to stock the raddi, the
applicant met her on the way and with an ill-intention caught
hold of her hand and insisted to follow him. When she resisted,
he abused her and also caused slit on her left hand with a blade.
No sooner, did she shout, her husband Ramesh came running,
thereafter, the applicant fled away. Accordingly, the case has
been registered against him.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
investigation is complete and challan has been filed. He is
innocent and has been falsely implicated. He has no criminal
antecedent. In the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
the prosecutrix has changed her version and never made
allegations attributable to Section 354 IPC. As such, there is a
material contradiction in the statement so recorded. That apart,
since he is no more required for further custodial interrogation
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
M.Cr.C.No.27286/2017 (Govind vs. State of M.P.)

2

and he is the sole bread earner of the family, therefore, counsel
prays that the applicant be enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State
supported the order impugned and opposed the bail application.

Having perused the case-diary and submission advanced,
this Court is of the opinion that without commenting on merits,
the applicant has to be enlarged on bail as challan has been filed
and the trial will take long time to conclude. Accordingly, the
application is hereby allowed. It is directed that the applicant be
enlarged on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the
sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac Only) with one solvent
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court
during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before
the Court concerned during trial and shall also comply with the
conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C.

A copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court for
necessary compliance.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Rohit Arya)
Judge
Kafeel

Digitally signed by Kafeel Ahmed Ansari

Kafeel Ahmed
DN: cIN, oHigh Court of Madhya Pradesh,
ouAdministration, postalCode452001,
stMadhya Pradesh,

Ansari
2.5.4.2008345dcd49ce70b9482a0cdd096366
9f80e64e3c96adeca6531dd3cb6f8f91fd,
cnKafeel Ahmed Ansari
Date: 2018.01.06 12:09:03 +05’30’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please CLICK HERE to read Group Rules, If You agree then JOIN HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DVACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA24, 125 CrPc, 307, 313, 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509 etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh