Tinku Das vs Unknown on 2 January, 2018

1

15 02.01.2018
Aloke Court 28 C.R.M. 12987 of 2017
In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed on 20.12.2017 in connection with
Liluah P.S. Case No. 314 of 2017 dated 20.11.2017 under
Sections 498A/406/323/307/504/506/354B/34 of the
Indian Penal Code.

And

In the matter of : Tinku Das

Mr. Siladitya Sanyal, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Pran Gopal Das
Mr. Sujan Chatterjee
… for the
Allowed Petitioner

Mr. Anwar Hossain
… for the State

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

petitioner is in custody for 10 days and it is submitted that

further detention of the petitioner is not necessary.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the

prayer for bail.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and

bearing in mind the nature of allegations, we are of the

opinion that further detention is not necessary in the facts of

the case and he may be enlarged on bail.

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be

released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees
2

Five Thousand only) with two sureties of like amount, one of

whom shall be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Howrah on condition that he shall appear

before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not

intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner

whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the

trial court, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail

without further reference to this Court.

The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.

Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be supplied expeditiously after complying with all

necessary legal formalities.

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *