rkd Ct. No.28 C.R.M. 114 of 2018
In Re: – An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04/01/2018 in
connection with Uttarpara P.S. Case No. 903 of 2017 dated
30/10/2017 under Sections 498A/306/304B/34 of the Indian
In the matter of: Kamalika Bakshi (Mukherjee)
Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Adv.,
Mr. A. Ghatak, Adv.,
Md. A. Ansari, Adv.,
Mr. Y. Deora, Adv.
…for the petitioner.
Mr. S. Banerjee, Adv.,
Ms. P. Ghosh, Adv.
…for the State.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is
the married sister-in-law of the victim housewife and it is
submitted that the petitioner stands on the same footing as the
co-accused person, namely Krishnendu Bakshi has been
enlarged on bail.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for
Having considered the materials in the case diary and
bearing in mind the fact that petitioner is the married sister-in-
law and the fact that the co-accused person, namely Krishnendu
Bakshi has been enlarged on bail, we are inclined in granting
anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on
bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of
like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and
also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)