SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Suresh Kumar & Anr vs State & Anr on 9 January, 2018

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1579 / 2014
1.Suresh Kumar S/o Lt. Shri Shankar Lal
2. Vijay Laxmi W/o Lt. Shri Shanker Lal
Both by caste Chhangani, residents of Surdasani ki Gali, barah
Guwar, Bikaner.
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan.
2. Meena Devi W/o Shri Suresh Kumar, by caste Chhangani,
resident of opposite Bheru Bhawan, Kanasari, Barah guwar,
Bikaner.
—-Respondent

__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. H.S.Shrimali
For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S.Rajpurohit, PP and Mr. M.S.Purohit
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
09/01/2018

The respondent Meena Devi is present in the Court. She

categorically stated that no offer whatsoever has been received

from the petitioners for settling dispute amicably and on the

contrary she is being threatened.

Learned counsel Mr. Shrimali vehemently urged that ex-facie

the contents of the impugned F.I.R. No. 67/2014 do not disclose

the necessary ingredients of the offences alleged and thus the

same deserves to be quashed.

Per contra learned P.P. and learned counsel for the

respondent submit that the petitioners misbehaved with the
(2 of 2)
[ CRLMP-1579/2014]

complainant. She was harassed and humiliated on numerous

occasions in relation demand of dowry. Learned P.P. has submitted

the factual report on record, as per which, the I.O. has found the

offences under Sections 498A, 406 and 323 IPC proved against

the petitioners after thorough investigation.

Having given my thoughtful consideration to the arguments

advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing

the material on record and considering the nature and gravity of

allegations set out in the F.I.R. and the factual report, , I am of

the firm opinion that the necessary ingredients of cognizable

offences are made out against the petitioners and hence it is not a

fit case wherein this Court can be persuaded to exercise its

inherent powers so as to to quash the F.I.R. at the inception.

Hence, the misc. petition is rejected as being devoid of

merit. The I.O. shall forthwith submit the result of investigation in

the Court concerned.

(SANDEEP MEHTA), J.

/sushil/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please CLICK HERE to read Group Rules, If You agree then JOIN HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DVACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA24, 125 CrPc, 307, 313, 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509 etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh