rkd Ct. No.28 C.R.M. 144 of 2018
In Re: – An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04/01/2018 in
connection with Khanakul P.S. Case No. 302 of 2016 dated
30/08/2016 under Sections 498A/302/304B of the Indian
Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
In the matter of: Mukul Mallick Anr.
Mr. N. S. Ghosh, Adv.,
…for the petitioners.
Mr. R. Nandy, Adv.,
…for the State.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the
petitioners are the brother-in-law and mother-in-law of the victim
housewife and it is submitted that they stand on the same
footing as the co-accused person, namely Angura Begam who
has been granted on anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for
Having considered the materials in the case diary and in
view of the fact that the co-accused person, namely Angura
Begam has been granted on anticipatory bail, we are inclined in
granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on
bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two
sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting
Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)